Letter · 1888

To Al. P. Chekhov, 24 September 1888. Moscow.

Ал. П. ЧЕХОВУ, 24 сентября 1888 г, Москва.

Headnote

1 Written from Moscow on 24 September 1888 to Chekhov’s elder brother Alexander Pavlovich Chekhov, who also wrote and published under the Chekhov name. It follows directly on the incident described: the publisher Alexei Suvorin, travelling near Simferopol and distracted by his young son’s grave illness, had read Alexander’s story "The Letter" in "New Times," disliked it, and dashed off an angry note to Alexander accusing him of "usurping" the family name. Suvorin then came straight to Chekhov in Moscow, pacing and near tears, to confess the letter had been an unfair outburst.

2 Chekhov reports Suvorin’s visit and self-reproach, then formally lays out, in a numbered list, why Alexander has every right to publish and sign as "Al. Chekhov": authorship and signature are a writer’s own business; the two brothers had already agreed the shared surname causes Chekhov no harm; and Suvorin’s own son, asked directly, said the editorial office welcomed more bylines reading "Chekhov" in the paper, whichever brother wrote them. Chekhov adds a wry aside comparing the case to Alphonse Daudet’s complaints about his less-known brother Ernest, dismisses the whole matter as not worth a "Sanhedrin," reflects briefly on mortality and not taking one’s own literary reputation too seriously, and closes by lumping the gossips who might make something of two same-named Chekhovs together as "Burenins and the rest of the smut-mongers" – Viktor Burenin being the "New Times" critic already established elsewhere in this correspondence as a scandal-prone columnist. The letter ends with sympathy for Suvorin’s genuine distress and a brief note that the family is well.

3 No graphic content; the letter’s one sharp phrase is "Burenins and the rest of the smut-mongers" (Бурениных и прочих похабников) in section 14 – a real insult (похабник carries a sense of "smut-peddler" or "foul-mouthed gossip") aimed at critics who might turn the two Chekhovs’ shared surname into scandal-sheet material; translated at full force rather than softened, per policy. "Suvorin" (sections 4-5, 11, 15) is the elder Alexei Sergeyevich Suvorin, Chekhov’s publisher; "Suvorin-fils" (section 8, rendered as in the Russian, which itself borrows the French tag) is explicitly distinguished as his son, who speaks for the editorial office in section 8-9 – do not conflate father and son. Alphonse Daudet and his brother Ernest Daudet (section 11) are the French writer and his own, less prominent journalist brother, cited purely as a parallel case of one sibling outshining another; they have no other connection to the Chekhovs. "An. Chekhov" and "Al. Chekhov" in section 14 are Anton (the letter-writer, signing with the standard abbreviation of his own first name) and Alexander (the addressee) respectively – kept as the bare initials Chekhov uses, since the whole point of the sentence is how interchangeable the two abbreviations look in print. The story under dispute, "Письмо" ("The Letter"), is Alexander’s own work, not Anton’s; it should not be confused with the present letter.

24 September 1888. Moscow.
24 сентября 1888 г, Москва.
24.
24.
Suvorin has just been to see me, and with his characteristic nervousness, pacing from corner to corner and peering over his spectacles, began tearfully confessing that he had committed an "unforgivable and clumsy stupidity" which he will never forgive himself for. He told me that, getting into the train near Simferopol and weighed down by grim thoughts and by his little son’s diphtheria-like illness, he read your story "The Letter" (not at all a bad story), which he did not like, and immediately wrote you a rude letter, something like: "Writing and printing bad stories is one thing, but usurping someone else’s name is another," and so on... That letter was written purely out of a wish to vent his gloom on the first person handy. You happened to be first, and so you caught it.
Сейчас был у меня Суворин и со свойственною ему нервозностью, с хождением из угла в угол и смотрением через очки стал мне слезно каяться, что он сделал "непростительную и неловкую глупость", которую никогда себе не простит. Он сообщил мне, что, садясь в вагон близ Симферополя и будучи удручен тяжкими мыслями и дифтеритообразною болезнью своего маленького сынишки, он прочел твой рассказ "Письмо" (рассказ очень неплохой), крый ему не понравился, и тотчас же написал тебе грубое письмо, что-то вроде! "Писать и печатать плохие рассказы можно, но узурпировать чужое имя нельзя и проч."... Письмо это написано просто из желания сорвать свою хандру на первом попавшемся. Ты был первый, тебе и влетело.
On arriving in Petersburg, Suvorin will apologize to you. For my part, I consider it necessary to state the following to you. There can be no talk whatever of usurpation or of counterfeiting someone else’s name, for:
По приезде в Петерб Суворин будет перед тобой извиняться. С своей стороны, считаю нужным заявить тебе следующее. Об узурпации и подделке под чужое имя не может быть и речи, ибо!
1) Every subject of Russia is free to write whatever he likes and to sign himself however he likes, and all the more so to sign his own name.
1) Каждый русскоподданный властен писать что угодно и подписываться как угодно, тем паче подписывать свое собственное) имя.
2) As for the fact that the signature "Al. Chekhov" is no inconvenience to me and involves me in no losses or disgrace, you and I have already discussed this and already come to an understanding on the matter. The criterion "one writes better, the other worse" cannot apply here, for times change and views and tastes differ. Whoever writes well today may turn out talentless tomorrow, and the other way around. That I have already published 4 books says nothing whatever against you or against your right. In 3 to 5 years you may have 10 books – so am I really going to have to ask your permission to sign myself Anton rather than Antip Chekhov?
2) О том, что подпись "Ал. Чехов" не представляет для меня неудобства и не вовлекает меня в протори и бесславие, у нас с тобой был уже разговор, и мы на этот счет с тобой уже условились. Критерий "один пишет лучше, другой хуже" не может иметь места, ибо времена переменчивы, взгляды и вкусы различны. Кто сегодня писал хорошо, тот завтра может превратиться в бездарность и наоборот. То, что мною уже изданы 4 книги, нимало не говорит против тебя и против твоего права. Через 3–5 лет у тебя может быть 10 книг, так неужели же и мне придется просить у тебя позволения расписываться Антоном, а не Антипом Чеховым?
3) When Suvorin-fils, speaking for the editorial office, asked me whether I had anything against Al. Chekhov, and I answered that I did not, he said:
3) Когда Суворин-фис от имени редакции спросил меня, не имею ли я чего-нибудь против Ал. Чехова, и когда я ответил отрицательно, то он сказал:
– That’s your affair. It’s better for us if the name Chekhov appears more often in the paper.
– Это ваше дело. Нам же лучше, если имя Чехова будет чаще встречаться в газете.
In apologizing, Suvorin will cite in his own defense a conversation he had with Alphonse Daudet, who complained to him about his brother Ernest Daudet. That conversation only proves that Alphonse Daudet is immodest and openly admits he is better than his brother, and it also proves that Ernest gets no peace from Alphonse, and that Alphonse complains about it.
Извиняясь, Суворин будет в свое оправдание приводить свой разговор с Альфонсом Додэ, который жаловался ему на брата Эрнеста Додэ. Этот разговор доказывает только то, что А. Додэ не скромен и открыто сознается, что он лучше брата, и еще доказывает, что Эрнесту от Альфонса житья нет и что Альфонс жалуется.
So long as I am not complaining and am not bringing suit, no one has any right to drag you before the Sanhedrin.
Пока я не жалуюсь и не являюсь истцом, до тех пор никто не вправе тащить тебя в Синедрион.
We cannot escape the hour of death, and we have not much longer left to live, and so I attach no serious importance either to my own writing, or to my own name, or to my own literary mistakes. I advise you to do the same. The more simply we look at ticklish questions like the one Suvorin has raised, the smoother our lives and our relations will be.
Смертного часа нам не миновать, жить еще придется недолго, а потому я не придаю серьезного значения ни своей литературе, ни своему имени, ни своим литературным ошибкам. Это советую и тебе. Чем проще мы будем смотреть на щекотливые вопросы вроде затронутого Сувориным, тем ровнее будут и наша жизнь, и наши отношения.
An. Chekhov and Al. Chekhov – what difference does it make? Let that concern the Burenins and the rest of the smut-mongers; you and I will stand aside.
Ан. Чехов и Ал. Чехов – не всё ли это равно? Пусть это интересует Бурениных и прочих похабников, а мы с тобой отойдем в сторону.
I feel sorry for Suvorin. He is sincerely upset.
Мне жаль Суворина. Он искренно опечален.
Everyone here is well.
Все наши здравы.
Yours, A. Chekhov.
Твой А. Чехов.

Cite this passage

To Al. P. Chekhov, 24 September 1888. Moscow.

Pick a format and click Copy. The permalink jumps any reader to this exact section.

Support this project

Free to read here. Buy the ebook to support the work.

Ebook coming soon

The ebook edition in this language is on its way.(English)