Letter · 1890

To Al. P. Chekhov, 25 February 1890. Moscow.

Ал. П. ЧЕХОВУ, 25 февраля 1890 г. Москва.

Headnote

1 Dating and addressee. 25 February 1890, Moscow. Addressed to Chekhov’s older brother Alexander Pavlovich Chekhov ("Al. P. Chekhovu" in the source dateline), teasingly called "Gusev" and opened with the mock-affectionate "Infusorian!" — a running joke of absurd pet names between the brothers. Written a matter of weeks before Chekhov’s departure (April 1890) for his journey across Siberia to the Sakhalin penal colony, at the height of his preparatory research.

2 Chekhov asks Alexander for as thorough a survey as possible of the newspaper literature on Sakhalin, explaining that he wants not just factual reportage but the "historical illumination" behind it: he distrusts both writers who had never set foot on Sakhalin and knew nothing of the subject, and self-interested writers who profited from the "Sakhalin question" while posing as disinterested. He tells Alexander that a hired female copyist will take over library visits to the Rumyantsev Library from the third week of Lent, and dismisses Alexander ("fool") from further trips to the Public Library, promising him other tasks by letter in the coming weeks. The letter closes with an earthy, self-deprecating riff on lice and personal uncleanliness (contra Goncharov’s Zakhar and their own brother Alexander, who apparently argued lice and bedbugs are unavoidable), a home remedy (sabadilla decoction) suggested for the pharmacy, family greetings, and the signoff "Your benefactor A. Chekhov."

5 it carries a full dateline, a discursive multi-sentence body across several topics, an affectionate running joke in the salutation, and a signed closing formula ("Твой благодетель А. Чехов" / "Your benefactor A. Chekhov").

25 February 1890. Moscow.
25 февраля 1890 г. Москва.
25 Feb.
25 февр.
Infusorian!
Инфузория!
I need as detailed an acquaintance as possible with the newspaper literature on Sakhalin, because it interests me not only for the information it gives. The information is, of course, valuable in itself, but, Gusev, one also needs the historical illumination of the facts that make up the substance of that information. The articles were written either by people who had never been to Sakhalin and understand nothing of the matter, or by interested people who have made both their capital and their innocence out of the Sakhalin question. The bravado of the first and the dodges of the second, as elements that obscure and impede, ought to be more valuable to the researcher than any amount of information, which for the most part is accidental and unreliable; these elements characterize excellently our society’s attitude to the matter in general, and to the prison matter in particular. As for the author and his motives, you will only understand them once you have read his article in full.
Мне необходимо возможно подробное знакомство с газетной литературой о Сахалине, ибо она интересует меня не со стороны одних только даваемых ею сведений. Сведения, конечно, сами по себе, но, Гусев, нужно и историческое освещение фактов, составляющих суть этих сведений. Статьи писались или людьми, никогда не бывавшими на Сахалине и ничего не смыслящими в деле, или же людьми заинтересованными, которые на сахалинском вопросе и капитал нажили, и невинность соблюли. Храбрость первых и уловки вторых, как элементы затемняющие и тормозящие, должны быть для исследователя ценнее всяких сведений, кои по большинству случаев случайны и неверны; элементы сии отлично характеризуют отношение нашего общества вообще к делу, а к тюремному в частности. Автора же и его побуждения поймешь только тогда, когда прочтешь его статью полностью.
In any case, spare the Public Library your visits. What you’ve done is enough. The rest will be copied out by the sister I have hired, who will begin her trips to the Rumyantsev Library from the third week of the fast. As for you, fool, I’ll find other work. Bow down and beg forgiveness. Everything you’ll need to do you’ll find in a letter you’ll get in the 4th or 5th week of the fast. And as for the lice, I can only say one thing: my own uncleanliness is death itself! Oblomov’s Zakhar and Alexander Chekhov say that one cannot get by without lice and bedbugs – that’s very scientific; but I, imagine, have more than once seen families who have no idea about these creatures. A great many things help against lice. Ask at the pharmacy about a decoction of sabadilla.
Во всяком случае избавь Публичную библиотеку от своих посещений. Достаточно и того, что ты сделал. Остальное будет переписано сестрою, которую я нанял и которая начнет свои хождения в Румянцевскую библиотеку с 3 недели поста. Тебе же, дураку, я найду другую работу. Кланяйся в ноги и проси прощения. Всё, что тебе нужно будет сделать, найдешь в письме, которое получишь на 4 или 5 неделе поста. А насчет вшей могу сказать только одно: смерть моя нечистоплотность! Обломовский Захар и Александр Чехов говорят, что без вшей и клопов нельзя обойтись – это очень научно; а я, представь, видел не раз семьи, которые понятия не имеют о сих тварях. От вшей помогает очень многое. Спроси в аптеке про отвар из сабадиллы.
Everyone here is well. Greetings to Natalya Alexandrovna, to Kuka, and to my godson.
Все наши здравствуют. Поклон Наталье Александровне, Куке и крестнику.
Your benefactor A. Chekhov.
Твой благодетель А. Чехов.

Cite this passage

To Al. P. Chekhov, 25 February 1890. Moscow.

Pick a format and click Copy. The permalink jumps any reader to this exact section.

Support this project

Free to read here. Buy the ebook to support the work.

Ebook coming soon

The ebook edition in this language is on its way.(English)