To A. S. Suvorin, 18 October 1888. Moscow.
А. С. СУВОРИНУ, 18 октября 1888 г. Москва.
Headnote
1 Written from Moscow on 18 October 1888 to Alexei Suvorin, eight days after the Pushkin Prize letter of 10 October, this is Chekhov’s detailed working letter about the play the two men are drafting together in collaboration – the piece that would eventually become "The Wood Demon" ("Леший"), Chekhov’s own reworking of which he later transformed into "Uncle Vanya." The letter opens by acknowledging the opening pages Suvorin has sent him, works through a full cast list with character sketches for a projected comedy, lays out a division of writing labor between the two collaborators act by act and character by character, adds a few closing items of Moscow news, digresses into a short essay on the difference between general and particular concepts (love of neighbor versus love of enemy, illustrated with examples from journalism, zoology, and medicine), and closes with an emphatic instruction to keep the whole project secret.
2 Chekhov thanks Suvorin for the pages he’s received and comments approvingly on Suvorin’s handling of the character Blagosvetlov (3), then gives notes on softening the character Anuchin’s speech (4) before running through the full playbill: the retired official Alexander Platonovich Blagosvetlov (6); his son Boris, a well-meaning but feckless student (7); his daughter Nastya, whom Chekhov sketches at length, including her infatuation with the character called the Wood Demon (8); old Anuchin, a cheerful, work-shy landowner (9); Viktor Petrovich Korovin, "the Wood Demon" himself, a passionate tree-planting idealist (10); the official Galakhov, Nastya’s practical-minded suitor (11); Vasily Gavrilovich Volkov, Blagosvetlov’s brother-in-law and estate manager (12); Volkov’s daughter Lyuba, the household’s fussing housekeeper (13); the peasant steward Semyon (14); and the wandering monk Feodosy (15). Chekhov then apportions the writing between himself and Suvorin character by character and act by act (16-18), reports briefly on Moscow acquaintances including "Alexei Alexeyevich" and a functionary nicknamed "Saturday" (19), digresses into reflections on Christian love of neighbor versus love of enemy and the danger of judging by particulars rather than general concepts, illustrated with examples from journalism and medicine (20), and closes with an apology for the letter’s length, a note that he is in good health, his signature, and a final instruction not to tell anyone about the play (21-24).